Author |
Message |
simmen
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:15 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am Posts: 15987 Gender: male
|
i don't think they palnned to attack a guy who got pure veh with no anti veh =P but still a funny battle report
_________________
Code: http://battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=4690 Thank you Michael http://www.battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=15076 Thank you developers (^-check out the topics)
|
|
Top |
|
XtremeRageX
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 238 Location: out of retirement - Mars
|
Simmen sure we are taking loses, but we are also killing there units too. We just dont post them on the forums. But ill post 2 BR's. Notice how we only sent 20 units and only lost 12 in this one The second Br is against there sub
_________________
Echo Conqueres of Mars 4 Age 5 OC
|
|
Top |
|
simmen
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:28 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am Posts: 15987 Gender: male
|
i have no idea which alliance chaos is in xD but yeah, i would gues you using tank is the reason for the first one since they had no explosive, and why hide? you lost 6-8 armor and 6-4 ranged tanks, i could calculate it out but to lazy
and i would gues you lost a nice amount of units on the last one since you cencored it
_________________
Code: http://battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=4690 Thank you Michael http://www.battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=15076 Thank you developers (^-check out the topics)
|
|
Top |
|
XtremeRageX
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:32 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 238 Location: out of retirement - Mars
|
no we lost 24. i just dont want our units to be exposed. If i can find the BR in my event list (the second one happened a while ago) ill show the losses. *EDIT* I found the BR. This one shows our loses in the second BR in my previous post.
_________________
Echo Conqueres of Mars 4 Age 5 OC
|
|
Top |
|
jakesaysffs
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:42 am |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:22 am Posts: 69 Gender: male
|
why does warpath build cons armoured inf wouldnt it be more sensible to build beam armoured inf?
_________________
OC/NC:Max crystals110/289 OC/NC:Max power80/684
|
|
Top |
|
simmen
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:09 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am Posts: 15987 Gender: male
|
because you are a newb still to new client because explosive units get hit first, then explosive, then beam, then concusive
_________________
Code: http://battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=4690 Thank you Michael http://www.battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=15076 Thank you developers (^-check out the topics)
|
|
Top |
|
XtremeRageX
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:58 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 238 Location: out of retirement - Mars
|
|
Top |
|
ChaosConjurer
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:36 pm |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:43 pm Posts: 80
|
Hey guys, lol
Funny story about that br with my units, I thought I muffed up big time by attacking the op, not sure what Lord Kellar was thinking, but for some reason he returned less units then what I sent.
p.s. simmen, i'm in TLS, lol, but I recently joined
|
|
Top |
|
jakesaysffs
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:12 am |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:22 am Posts: 69 Gender: male
|
ye but simmen hes only got 1 type of armoured making it pointless:P so still wouldnt it be better to have beam armoured since they pewpew vechs?:D
_________________
OC/NC:Max crystals110/289 OC/NC:Max power80/684
|
|
Top |
|
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: Echo vs TLS Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:18 am |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
jakesaysffs wrote: ye but simmen hes only got 1 type of armoured making it pointless:P so still wouldnt it be better to have beam armoured since they pewpew vechs?:D concussive armors even out the losses in an alliance. So if 3 people attack with all concussive armors, it will even out the armor losses between all 3 people.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|