Author |
Message |
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:50 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2757 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
A Person moving his army out, does not attack a neutral TB that too in a place where you weren't supposed to be. You lay outposts, and move your army out. And yes if moving out were your intentions, that should have been notified.
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
CaesarLegion
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:25 am |
|
Private 1st class |
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:06 pm Posts: 10
|
Ferr3t wrote: From what I can see, Vault or somebody in M should have notified ML.. M, you DID break the pact but you >>ASSUMED<< ML would notice that Vault was just moving his army up. I have seen MANY alliances fall over this because they 'ASSUME' a NAP means the pact partner cannot move into their hive and because they 'ASSUME' they can move their armies out of forbidden territory without notifying the pact partners. M, it's your fault for assuming ML knows that Vault had a legit reason to be in Africa >.>
Now don't complain, don't troll the forum, learn from it and never take anything for granted again. M were following orders and don't forget YOU M had giving them permission to engage squads in Africa, as I said, it's all your fault ^_^ mfreak wrote: A Person moving his army out, does not attack a neutral TB that too in a place where you weren't supposed to be. You lay outposts, and move your army out. And yes if moving out were your intentions, that should have been notified. Read the first post I wrote!!! ROTD and myself both informed ML leader I was just moving my units home. mfreak, I was forced 2 lay low on Africa as my first movement op was taken, until I figured out a way 2 pass my army home. Also to try and avoid what happened there with the spy, but I guess I was too slow =/ but you cant seroiusly expect 2 drop the blame on me. I was trying 2 get out, and ML didnt allow me, even tho they told my leader is was ok, and even tho I reported the op to their leader. So Ferr3t, no its not my fault, and read be4 criticize me again And eddie, soz this is the account I mistakenly made to play Galaxy, as I thought I couldnt use my first account 4 it xD but yea Im VD and no I dont use 2 accounts on the same world which would b multi and after all of my worlds are done with this account I wont use it anymore to fix my error.
|
|
Top |
|
Ferr3t
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:30 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:38 am Posts: 2968 Location: Broome, Western Australia Gender: male
|
What I said is that you have have CONTACTED the leader again! You had plenty of warning that they weren't happy with you there due to the fact that you took the OP.. As I said, you assumed the message had gotten through, thus you lost your army.
_________________ Retired Head Mod
Most Crystals: 121 Highest Power: 212
Sensual bath time feat. Ferr3t
|
|
Top |
|
TheReturnOfTheDead
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 8:39 am |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:35 pm Posts: 327 Location: Remsen, Iowa Gender: male
|
Ferr3t wrote: What I said is that you have have CONTACTED the leader again! You had plenty of warning that they weren't happy with you there due to the fact that you took the OP.. As I said, you assumed the message had gotten through, thus you lost your army. We CONTACTED him. Vault was trying to please ML by leaving Africa and letting him have the bottom space. Anyhow, This broke out a war between M and ML. We have destoryed 95% of thier outposts and TB's in NA. Only 250 inf are left in USA. They took out our units in Africa.
_________________ The Italian Mafia
|
|
Top |
|
VaultDweller
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:43 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:18 pm Posts: 349 Location: Behind you! Gender: male
|
Ferr3t wrote: What I said is that you have have CONTACTED the leader again! You had plenty of warning that they weren't happy with you there due to the fact that you took the OP.. As I said, you assumed the message had gotten through, thus you lost your army. Ferr3t, ML leader participated in the attack on my army. *Sigh* why do you continue trying 2 put the blame on me? I did all I was supposed 2 do on peace times, and I was in all of my right to fully attack ML the moment they took my op. Instead, I lingered in Africa waiting 4 a peaceful resolve, and 4 an idea 2 get outta Africa xD and dude, youre not even inside ML nor M so how can you say we didnt contact ML? We may b friends, but I grow tired of you questioning my every move or decision. Would you pls stop it already?
_________________
The New Brotherhood of Steel... brothers till death rip us apart
|
|
Top |
|
w1lll
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:55 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:54 am Posts: 846 Location: Land - Plains Swamp
|
ML had a significant amount of forces in the USA. It did appear that they were trying to get as close to us as possible without us noticing. Why else would they have had training bases and over 300 units there?
_________________ Battle Dawn Wiki. W1lll is not currently here. Please leave a message after the tone.
|
|
Top |
|
torpet
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:22 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:08 pm Posts: 41
|
I love how topics like this go. Always a good read.
Just some questions about this.
Vault why not move units before you joined M?
w1ll you dont think they might have been ther before you moved?
_________________ Earth=S-MupT-DSB-GIFTx4-Econ-ML-PS-39th Fantasy=ZF
|
|
Top |
|
w1lll
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:24 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:54 am Posts: 846 Location: Land - Plains Swamp
|
torpet wrote: w1ll you dont think they might have been ther before you moved?
I would have believed that, had ML units not been taking OPs closer and closer to us.
_________________ Battle Dawn Wiki. W1lll is not currently here. Please leave a message after the tone.
|
|
Top |
|
torpet
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:31 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:08 pm Posts: 41
|
maybe have a look at the map your leader made for the forums on tick 200
_________________ Earth=S-MupT-DSB-GIFTx4-Econ-ML-PS-39th Fantasy=ZF
|
|
Top |
|
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: ML going low Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:14 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2757 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
VaultDweller wrote: Ferr3t wrote: What I said is that you have have CONTACTED the leader again! You had plenty of warning that they weren't happy with you there due to the fact that you took the OP.. As I said, you assumed the message had gotten through, thus you lost your army. Ferr3t, ML leader participated in the attack on my army. *Sigh* why do you continue trying 2 put the blame on me? I did all I was supposed 2 do on peace times, and I was in all of my right to fully attack ML the moment they took my op. Instead, I lingered in Africa waiting 4 a peaceful resolve, and 4 an idea 2 get outta Africa xD and dude, youre not even inside ML nor M so how can you say we didnt contact ML? We may b friends, but I grow tired of you questioning my every move or decision. Would you pls stop it already? Dude you were moving your army out. Why would you need a TB in Africa for that :/
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|