It is currently Sun Aug 18, 2019 10:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:59 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:44 pm
Posts: 109
Gender: male
I suggest adding ten nuclear power plants across wider map and give like +2 energy per tick for example.

_________________
It is what it is


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 5:22 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 2610
Location: in my happy place
Gender: female
King Aladar wrote:
I suggest adding ten nuclear power plants across wider map and give like +2 energy per tick for example.

get your own thread.

_________________
Image

Image

free tokens!

Skype: bazinga124

-Baz


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 6:24 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:40 am
Posts: 1
I think battledawn should create a multi select army button then I dont need to waste time moving them

Please create this

Thanks


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 6:55 am 
Private
Private
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:47 am
Posts: 1
the suggestions are awesome. this will lead to more war and more armies dying . however i dont suggest to attack relic from relic. that point i feel is not good. Rest are outstanding. I would give a thumbs up

One more suggestion i feel energy quota is low. please increase to atleast 1000. i also suggest pls give energy resource in maps like gold resource outpost so as there is increase in ouput of energy. becoz when we fire ioncannon to destroy missileit takes 250 energy and when again the missile is fired there is no energy left to destroy it.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 7:01 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 10:36 am
Posts: 41
Location: no
Gender: male
sounds pretty damn great to me


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:01 am 
Head Moderator
Head Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:02 pm
Posts: 1622
bigthunder wrote:
when any has a relic he can attak evrything what he want from it , and no one can attak the relic back , becouse they can only attak it from another relic , haha this is a joke!


You misread my friend, the original topic idea was that relic CAN'T attack anything but relics. You could use it to move, but then you'd have to stop and place an OP before you could do anything. However, this is the biggest complaint we're received on this idea in general. If you continue reading through some of the posts after the original, we've attempted many revisions for possible improvements to that specific issue.

dev0084 wrote:
the suggestions are awesome. this will lead to more war and more armies dying . however i dont suggest to attack relic from relic. that point i feel is not good. Rest are outstanding. I would give a thumbs up

One more suggestion i feel energy quota is low. please increase to atleast 1000. i also suggest pls give energy resource in maps like gold resource outpost so as there is increase in ouput of energy. becoz when we fire ioncannon to destroy missileit takes 250 energy and when again the missile is fired there is no energy left to destroy it.


The issue with adding more energy is that it is supposed to be hard to have. It's resource management and although I would personally LOVE to have more energy income (as I very seldom have over 50 at any given time and convert like crazy), adding more could very well become a problem. There are some that use energy a lot, and other's that seldom touch it. You should not be able to ion nukes easily. They are 250 energy because we don't want them fired easily.

Also, as a quick note! This topic is for this suggestion. If you wish to add in new suggestions, you are more than free to submit in the "suggestions" thread. But we are looking for specific feedback to this suggestion in here :D Thank you!

_________________
Image
Gettin' real tired of your shi...


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:31 am 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:39 am
Posts: 16
hi i love the idea but i think a bit should change if you want to do this first of all i dont think relics should only be able to be attacked by other relics i think it should not be that way instead and one can atttack and if you would like to do this i think you will need to put much more relics and wrekeges other then that i think everything is good
regards
tripster :D :D :D :D :D :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:33 am 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 18
Would you know beforehand if a wreck contains a fragment? Because if you can only hold one Fragment and you attack a wreck that has a fragment what happens?

Also what about solo worlds and 2 man alliances? if you need 5 fragments and you only have two members how can you get enough for a relic.

Also I dont think this helps new players very much because most of the time there is only three or four active people in the alliance. This can mean those wrecks become useless. Also if relics can only attack relics, then do you need a relic to attack one or can you attack from anywhere. Also how does nuking come into play, If you try to move a relic to someones hive they will just nuke the relic and take it from you.

Also i dont see how this reduces subs. It would just give more incentive to have subs, because then you can get more fragments and get more relics and essentially just sit in your area with your 60 people and 5 relics.

I think it does not address the part of BD that everyone is ignoring. The fact that each world only two teams show up(at least on mars). Every era its only two teams going for the win. To increase competition you need to have more people trying for the win in each round. Makes the game harder and more fun.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:34 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:20 am
Posts: 37
I love this idea!!! Only question I have is can fragments only be obtained by wreckages or is their other ways to get them? :)


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Improved Relic Suggestion!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:36 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:11 pm
Posts: 2
i think that you are finaly killing this game.
every era there is 10 -20% less players, old players are leaving game, new cant learn complicate rules so fast, old doesnt have time for this...
instead of fixing isues of game, you are making it more complicate.
go on, kill BD finaly with your new hokus-pokus, add some "black holes" , mega portals, quantum physics, interstellar time worps, tunnels betwean Earth 2 and Mars 3 ...
i am shure that spoiled brats like Malice who suggest this "Improoved Jump into more Chaos", who doesnt do nothing else in life then think about more useless improoves will be happy with this new improove, but you will keep loosing old players even faster, and new players will quit even faster then so far .
and BD will die .


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl