Not really

Red, I like you, but I am gonna have to disagree with you on this one. When Jasper stated that there were many alliances working hard to make sure coalitions didn't come back then to me that is a type of coalition. Granted it isn't as extreme as what john wants, but it is a mild form of a coalition.

Just like what happened to me last week. I hate my nieghbor with a passion. He is a mean old man and I hope he dies soon, but we had an issue with a herd of elk that liked to come through our yards eating up our grass and pooping all over the place. We didn't talk directly, but we had an unspoken agreement that we were going to rid ourselves of the pesky elk. I did what I could and he did what he could... Eventually the elk dissappeared. Last week I was stanging outside on my deck and noticed the mean old man starring down into my lawn.... and then I saw it... an elk! I looked up and he actualled gave me a hint of a smile and acknowledement. Looks like this week we are going to form a non-existant coalition again to declare war on the elk again.

I know that story was a stretch, but it was a recent one and I think it proves a slight point. It might not be a verbal or written coalition, but it is still a coalition.

I will be here all week....

Ermmm, not really. A coalition in BD will jump into all wars that 1 alliance in the coalition has. They have all the same allies, enemies, etc....

In this case, there are just people and alliances that hate coalitions and sub-empires. They will probably be allies in a war against a sub-empire or coalition, but that doesn't make them a coalition themselves.

I understand that you are using coalition in the BD sense of the term, but the actuall use of the term coalition fits right into a bunch of alliances against anything... even if they don't plan thier attacks together.. me and my neighbor didn't plan our attacks together, but we set out accomplish the same goal and we did with each others help.

we can argue over terms all day long, but in the end by definition of the term coalition... looks they are already on BD

John i would like to pair up with you agian. my name will Be Virus of Random on every world i play. Just pm or msg on here if i could join

So, nobody is doing Subs this round? Good.

Though i'm sure there are already Coalitions, i'm not even going to bother with that drama.

The UAC is a coalition, but I am assured that it has not much of a future.


Just because we hate subs and take them down, doesn't mean were a coalition. We simply have common interests and help eachother achieve them. Any other wars we ignore eachother.

Coalitions help each other on all areas, with all things, we don't.

Should we make it a policy to enemy alliances that are asking for subs?

So like I should go ahead and make xsmx red?

lol I think if an alliance wants subs or coalitions let them havem. its not really gonna get them no where buit less score because they cant conquer their subs lol which is alot more score. So i mean say an alliance forms well by tick 300 they have 3 full subs. well thats over 70 ppl they cant conquer that they couldve to get score.



-Virus

Just let me know when and where. You know i'd love to